More on the big meetings in Chicago (annual AMA meeting). One of the big topics of discussion was the current push for/against limits to resident work hours. It's timely considering the
editorial in
Newsweek this week lamenting the horrible lives of sweatshop workers who have to work 70 hour weeks. All that is being asked for here is an 80-hour 6-day workweek, you'd think people were asking to be paid to stay home.
Honestly, who wants to be seen by a doctor who hasn't slept 4 hours at a clip in over a month and possibly hasn't slept at all in over a day. At least sweatshop workers don't have malpractice insurance premiums higher than their annual salaries, nor the threat of being sued for sums higher than most small nations' GNPs. I'm starting to think I'm definately in the wrong game here. On that same note, I hear there is legislation (proposed, of course by lobbyists for the legal profession) that there be not only no monetary limit to "pain and suffering" damages, but no limit to the relation to the victim. As in, your 9th cousin has a miscarriage and you can then sue the doctor for something like $20 million. Smart.
That logic leads to
situations like we have now in
New Jersey and other states where, if things don't change, it will not be possible to get a physician to deliver a baby. The choices will be nurse, midwife or taxi driver. Insurance companies are dropping obstetricians wholesale, not because they're screwing up and not because they're losing lawsuits but rather because they MIGHT be sued in the future and damages awards are getting too scary for the insurance companies to ponder.
Anyway, I'll see if I can get some of this linked to more reliable sources to back up my claims.